From Cloudflare’s headline-making takedown of the Daily Stormer last autumn to YouTube’s summer restrictions on LGBTQ content, there’s been a surge in “voluntary” platform censorship. Companies—under pressure from lawmakers, shareholders, and the public alike—have ramped up restrictions on speech, adding new rules, adjusting their still-hidden algorithms and hiring more staff to moderate content. They have banned ads from certain sources and removed “offensive” but legal content.
These moves come in the midst of a fierce public debate about what responsibilities platform companies that directly host our speech have to take down—or protect—certain types of expression. And this debate is occurring at a time in whoch only a few large companies host most of our online speech. Under the First Amendment, intermediaries generally have a right to decide what kinds of expression they will carry. But just because companies can act as judge and jury doesn’t mean they should.
Här har du Mackens Nyheter det senaste dygnet (20 oktober 2025)
Här har du Mackens Nyheter det senaste dygnet (20 oktober 2025) Kom igång med smarta förslag i din digitala dagbok Ett riktigt bra tips för Journal (Dagbok) i iOS är att använda reflektionsförslag för att skriva mer regelbundet och personligt.…

0 kommentarer